In 1926, the United Kingdom passed the Electricity (Supply) Act, a landmark policy that unified the nation’s fragmented power networks.

The legislation established the Central Electricity Board (CEB) and created a standardized national grid, ensuring reliable electricity distribution.

By consolidating private and regional infrastructure, Britain modernized its energy sector, laying the foundation for widespread industrial and economic growth.

A century later, a similar transformation may be unfolding with Bitcoin mining and national strategy.

Senator Cynthia Lummis has already introduced the BITCOIN Act, which proposes the establishment of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under the U.S. Treasury.

The initiative would see the federal government acquiring up to one million Bitcoin over a 20-year period, ensuring the asset is positioned as a hedge against inflation and integrated into national financial resilience plans.

Why a Strategic Bitcoin Mining and Compute Act Must Follow

While the BITCOIN Act focuses on accumulation, securing Bitcoin at a national level requires more than just reserves—it demands a robust mining infrastructure and domestic manufacturing of Bitcoin mining hardware.

A Strategic Bitcoin Mining and Compute Act has yet to be introduced, but its necessity is clear when examining how quickly initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act and the recently announced Stargate Initiative were passed to address national computing and semiconductor security.

China currently dominates ASIC manufacturing, leaving the U.S. reliant on foreign supply chains for the backbone of Bitcoin mining.

A federally backed initiative could incentivize domestic ASIC production, immersion and hydro cooling technology, and high-performance mining compute systems, ensuring a self-sufficient mining industry while reinforcing national security and grid stability.

The Stargate Initiative, aimed at developing a national AI computing infrastructure, demonstrates how rapidly political momentum can shift when policymakers recognize the strategic importance of compute power.

If AI infrastructure can be prioritized at the federal level, Bitcoin mining—an industry already operating high-performance computing sites—should also be considered for national integration.

Mining sites, often located in energy-abundant regions, could work in tandem with AI compute sites, providing on-demand energy balancing, heat recapture solutions, and distributed compute resources.

Much like the CHIPS Act revitalized U.S. semiconductor production, a Strategic Bitcoin Mining and Compute Act could establish the framework for securing the Bitcoin network, ensuring energy-efficient operations, and strengthening the nation’s digital and financial resilience.

Bitcoin as a Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Priority

Critics of the BITCOIN Act caution that federal involvement in Bitcoin could create distortions in the free market.

However, supporters argue that Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and immutable supply make it an unparalleled economic safeguard, especially in an era of increased monetary uncertainty.

A Strategic Bitcoin Mining and Compute Act, alongside the BITCOIN Act, could establish a long-term, forward-thinking approach to securing the Bitcoin network while driving U.S. technological and financial leadership.

^{BitcoinVersus.Tech Editor’s Note:}

^{We volunteer daily to ensure the credibility of the information on this platform is Verifiably True. If you would like to support to help further secure the integrity of our research initiatives, please donate here}

BitcoinVersus.tech is not a financial advisor. This media platform reports on financial subjects purely for informational purposes.