China’s central bank has reportedly determined that promotional activity connected with the Solana blockchain violated mainland cryptocurrency restrictions and plans further scrutiny of organizations and individuals involved. Reports published November 6 cite the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) following the disruption of a Solana developer event in Shanghai on October 16. The reported inquiry concerns marketing and local participation; no evidence establishes an enforcement action against the decentralized Solana network itself.

According to a November 6 summary of Financial Times reporting, a PBOC official said SOL is a cryptocurrency and Solana’s ecosystem supports services involving assets including USDT. The official reportedly regarded promotion of the network as inconsistent with China’s February rules. BitcoinVersus.Tech could verify the underlying national regulations independently, but could not locate a separate public PBOC notice naming an individual target or announcing charges.

Shanghai Event Preceded the Inquiry

Solana Accelerate China was scheduled to begin in Shanghai on October 16 as the first stop of a four-city developer tour. Attendees described police officers at the venue, while organizers notified registrants of a postponement. At the time, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu attributed the disruption to registration numbers exceeding local attendance limits. The reported regulatory assessment adds a separate explanation, but a detailed enforcement order has not been published.

The Shanghai campaign followed public discussion of a local office and prominent advertising in the Lujiazui financial district. Developer outreach, token promotion and financial services are not legally interchangeable, making the precise activity under review important. The blockchain’s underlying engineering continues to develop, including the Solana Web3.js software toolkit and delivery-versus-payment settlement work, neither of which establishes that mainland marketing was authorized.

China’s February Rules Address Advertising Directly

On February 6, eight Chinese agencies, including the PBOC, issued an updated notice defining specified virtual-currency businesses as prohibited financial activities. The official regulation restricts internet platforms from providing marketing, commercial displays or paid referrals for prohibited cryptocurrency businesses. It also instructs market regulators to investigate unlawful digital-asset advertisements and limits services offered to mainland customers by overseas entities.

The rules distinguish approved blockchain applications from cryptocurrency trading and promotion. A technical conference therefore cannot be assumed unlawful merely because developers discuss distributed ledgers, but promotional activity associated with token trading may trigger scrutiny. The legal distinction matters for firms considering China-facing blockchain products, including cross-border digital-asset custody services.

What Remains Unconfirmed

The public record reviewed for the report does not identify the legal entities or individuals expected to face investigation, potential penalties, or any formal response by the Solana Foundation to the November 6 reports. The event’s cancellation and the newly reported PBOC interpretation should not be presented as evidence of criminal liability or a blockchain shutdown.

The reported development may constrain public cryptocurrency promotion by foreign blockchain ecosystems in mainland China. Its operational effect will depend on subsequent notices, identifiable enforcement actions and any response from affected organizers. A distinction also remains between local promotion restrictions and the technical operation of Solana validators distributed internationally.

China’s wider digital-asset policy also affects tokenized financial instruments, an area explored in earlier coverage of institutional blockchain settlement. Further reporting should establish whether investigators pursue advertising intermediaries, event organizers or other domestic service providers.

We volunteer daily to ensure the information on this platform is Verifiably True. If you would like to support the research, please scan QR code.

Scan the original BitcoinVersus.Tech donation QR code using another device to support independent research.

Editor’s Note. The November 6 investigation is attributed to news reporting citing the PBOC. The February 6 regulation was checked against the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission’s published text. No public case-specific PBOC order or independently confirmed penalties were identified. All in-story illustrations are conceptual, not documentary photographs. No unverified YouTube or social-media embeds were included.